Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 46 (6):758-781 (2021)

Authors
Daniel Groll
Carleton College
Abstract
The Significant Interest view entails that even if there were no medical reasons to have access to genetic knowledge, there would still be reason for prospective parents to use an identity-release donor as opposed to an anonymous donor. This view does not depend on either the idea that genetic knowledge is profoundly prudentially important or that donor-conceived people have a right to genetic knowledge. Rather, it turns on general claims about parents’ obligations to help promote their children’s well-being and the connection between a person’s well-being and the satisfaction of what I call their “worthwhile significant subjective interests.” To put this view simply, the fact that a donor-conceived person—who knows she is donor-conceived—is likely to be very interested in acquiring genetic knowledge gives prospective parents a weighty reason to use an identity-release donor. This is because parents should promote their children’s well-being through the satisfaction of their children’s worthwhile significant interests.
Keywords gamete donation  parents  well-being  children
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/jhab027
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Meaning in Life and Why It Matters.Susan Wolf - 2010 - Princeton University Press.
Meaning in Life and Why It Matters (Markus Rüther).Susan Wolf - 2011 - Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 64 (3):308.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

How Many Parents Should There Be in a Family?Kalle Grill - 2020 - Journal of Applied Philosophy (3):467-484.
Well-Being and Health.Richard Kim & Daniel M. Haybron - 2021 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 46 (6):645-655.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ethical Problems with Ethnic Matching in Gamete Donation.Hane Htut Maung - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (2):112-116.
Should Mitochondrial Donation Be Anonymous?John B. Appleby - 2018 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43 (2):261-280.
Rethinking the Moral Permissibility of Gamete Donation.Melissa Moschella - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (6):421-440.
Sperm Donation and the Right to Privacy.Oliver Hallich - 2017 - The New Bioethics 23 (2):107-120.
Gamete Donation and Parental Responsibility.Tim Bayne - 2003 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (1):77-87.
Ethics Briefings.R. Mussell - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (5):322-324.
Ethics Briefings.E. Chrispin, S. Brannan, M. Davies, V. English, R. Mussell, J. Sheather & A. Sommerville - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (3):191-192.
Ethics Briefings.S. Brannan, M. Davies, V. English, R. Mussell, J. Sheather, E. Chrispin & A. Sommerville - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (1):63-64.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-04-19

Total views
171 ( #67,663 of 2,499,055 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #17,117 of 2,499,055 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes