The evolution and development of human social systems requires more than parasite-stress avoidance explanation

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (2):88-89 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Fincher & Thornhill (F&T) present a model of in-group assortative sociality resulting from differing levels of parasite-stress in differing geographical locations in the United States and the world. Their model, while compelling, overlooks some important issues, such as mutualistic associations with parasites that are beneficial to humans and how some religious practices increase parasite risk

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Towards a model of host-parasite relationships.L. Dujardin & E. Dei-cas - 1999 - Acta Biotheoretica 47 (3-4):253-266.
The organism in developmental systems theory.Thomas Pradeu - 2010 - Biological Theory 5 (3):216-222.
Affect systems and neural systems.Eric A. Salzen - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):216-217.
The evolution of evolutionary systems design.Alexander Laszlo & Kathia Laszlo - 2002 - World Futures 58 (5 & 6):351 – 363.
Theorizing the mechanisms of conceptual and semiotic space.Colin Wight - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2):283-299.
The nature of evolution.Alexander Laszlo - 2009 - World Futures 65 (3):204 – 221.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
21 (#695,936)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references