How Would Karl Rahner Respond to “Dominus Iesus”?

Philosophy and Theology 13 (2):425-436 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This short essay will attempt to show that although Karl Rahner would be in basic agreement with the concern of “Dominus Iesus” about “religious relativism” and in basic agreement with the claims of the Catholic Church (as expressed in Vatican II) about the role of Jesus as universal savior and about the unique role of the Roman Catholic church in God’s salvific plan for the world, he would not agree with the spirit or tone of this declaration from a Vatican Congregation. Rahner’s writings set a more positive tone framed by his classic retrieval of the concept of mystery in Roman Catholic theology that invites dialog with people of other religious traditions. Three characteristics of that invitational spirit of Rahner are highlighted in this essay: (1) the life-long process of becoming Christian; (2) the inadequacy of all human expressions in the face of mystery; (3) the need to be non-competitive in any ecumenical or inter-religious dialog.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,271

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Faith.Karl Rahner - 2006 - Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):393-399.
The Spirit of Christ as Entelechy.David Coffey - 2001 - Philosophy and Theology 13 (2):363-398.
A Prophetic Voice.Richard Penaskovic - 2011 - Philosophy and Theology 23 (2):283-300.
I Am, of Course, No Prophet.Peter Joseph Fritz - 2011 - Philosophy and Theology 23 (2):317-332.
Rahnerian Freedom.Mark Joseph T. Calano - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 20:51-68.


Added to PP

43 (#356,248)

6 months
7 (#382,198)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references