Oxford, England: Oxford University Press (1990)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The Cartesian method, construed as a way of organizing domains of knowledge according to the "order of reasons," was a powerful reductive tool. Descartes made significant strides in mathematics, physics, and metaphysics by relating certain complex items and problems back to more simple elements that served as starting points for his inquiries. But his reductive method also impoverished these domains in important ways, for it tended to restrict geometry to the study of straight line segments, physics to the study of ambiguously constituted bits of matter in motion, and metaphysics to the study of the isolated, incorporeal knower. This book examines in detail the negative and positive impact of Descartes's method on his scientific and philosophical enterprises, exemplified by the Geometry, the Principles, the Treatise of Man, and the Meditations.
|
Keywords | Methodology History Analysis (Philosophy History Reductionism History |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 1991 |
Buy this book | $83.99 used $101.00 new Amazon page |
Call number | B1875.G76 1991 |
ISBN(s) | 0198242506 9780198242505 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options

Introduction
Descartes was not only a philosopher, but a mathematician and physicist as well. Over the centuries and with currently renewed intensity, his Meditations inspired serious discussions among philosophers. This book a... see more
Descartes’s Principles: Physical Unities
This chapter examines Descartes's difficulties in establishing starting points for his physics. In one sense, the starting point of the Principles, taken as a whole, is opposed to God and man as radically different... see more
Descartes’s Physiology
This chapter treats Descartes's physiology based on the Treatise of Man, claiming that his physiology must be read as a materialist epistemology. It turns to Descartes's attempt to reconstruct the even higher-level... see more
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Philosophy and Memory Traces: Descartes to Connectionism.John Sutton - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
The Necessity in Deduction: Cartesian Inference and its Medieval Background.Calvin G. Normore - 1993 - Synthese 96 (3):437 - 454.
Leibniz's Models of Rational Decision.Markku Roinila - 2008 - In Marcelo Dascal (ed.), Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist? Springer. pp. 357-370.
Obscurity and Confusion: Nonreductionism in Descartes's Biology and Philosophy.Barnaby Hutchins - 2016 - Dissertation, Ghent University
La géométrie analytique cartésienne du point de vue représentationnel.Andoni Ibarra - 1999 - Enrahonar:257-260.
Similar books and articles
The Imposition of Method: A Study of Descartes and Locke.Peter A. Schouls - 1980 - Oxford University Press.
Geometry, Time and Force in the Diagrams of Descartes, Galileo, Torricelli and Newton.Emily R. Grosholz - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:237 - 248.
A Case Study in the Application of Mathematics to Physics: Descartes' Principles of Philosophy, Part II.Emily R. Grosholz - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:116 - 124.
Cartesian Method and the Aristotelian-Scholastic Method.D. Anthony Larivière - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (3):463-486.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
83 ( #140,053 of 2,506,510 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,726 of 2,506,510 )
2009-01-28
Total views
83 ( #140,053 of 2,506,510 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,726 of 2,506,510 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads