Overcoming Frege’s curse: heuristic reasoning as the basis for teaching philosophy of science to scientists

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (1):1-15 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A lot of philosophy taught to science students consists of scientific methodology. But many philosophy of science textbooks have a fraught relationship with methodology, presenting it either a system of universal principles or entirely permeated by contingent factors not subject to normative assessment. In this paper, I argue for an alternative, heuristic perspective for teaching methodology: as fallible, purpose- and context-dependent, subject to cost-effectiveness considerations and systematically biased, but nevertheless subject to normative assessment. My pedagogical conclusion from this perspective is that philosophers should aim to teach science students heuristic reasoning: strategies of normative method choice appraisal that are sensitive to purposes, contexts, biases and cost-effectiveness considerations; and that we should do so by teaching them exemplars of such reasoning. I illustrate this proposal at the hand of three such exemplars, showing how they help students to appreciate the heuristic nature of both methods and methodology, and to normatively assess method choice in such circumstances.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reasoning with heuristics.Brett Karlan - 2021 - Ratio 34 (2):100-108.
Teaching Goodness.Linnéa Franits - 2006 - Teaching Philosophy 29 (2):81-92.
Teaching Goodness.Robert Halliday & Linnéa Franits - 2006 - Teaching Philosophy 29 (2):81-92.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-07

Downloads
10 (#1,026,208)

6 months
4 (#320,252)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?