Studi di Estetica 20 (2021)

Authors
Abstract
This paper aims to examine the very unstable concept of the “uncanny” from an atmospherological point of view. Its official theoretical “sanction” is due to Heidegger, who considered it the latent but fundamental ground of any being-in-the-world, and especially to Freud, who described it as the feeling that arises when something familiar suddenly becomes unfamiliar. Freud claimed to be inspired in this conception by Schelling's definition of unheimlich, which I try to explain to better understand what an uncanny atmosphere is. It seems characterized by elements such as ontological ambiguity-vagueness and paranoid subjectification, alien corporeality and unpredictable situations. The paper ends with a brief analysis of the specific uncanny of houses, both in terms of their transformation from a secure interior to an uncanny place and in terms of the anxiety about materially inheriting a house and thus cohabiting with the past. In the perspective adopted here, the uncanny shows that we are not at home within our own body because we always coexist with an external-foreign and in this sense “monstrous” presence.
Keywords Atmosphere  Monstrosity  Uncanny
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,587
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Uncanny.Nicholas Royle - 2003 - Routledge.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Heidegger on Being Uncanny.Katherine Withy - 2015 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
The Ill Body and Das Unheimliche (the Uncanny).A. Warsop - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (5):484-495.
What is the Uncanny?Mark Windsor - 2019 - British Journal of Aesthetics 59 (1):51-65.
Can the Uncanny Be Represented?Ying-Hsiung Chou - 2007 - American Journal of Semiotics 23 (1/4):97-121.
The Uncanny.Nicholas Royle - 2003 - Routledge.
Towards the Techno-Social Uncanny.Alexander Matthias Gerner - 2019 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 75 (4):2171-2206.
Monstrosity and the Limits of the Intellect: Philosophy as Teratomachy in Descartes.Filippo Del Luchesse - 2011 - Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 19 (1):107-134.
Heidegger: On Being Uncanny by Katherine Withy. [REVIEW]David Vessey - 2016 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (2):347-348.
Freud on the Uncanny: A Tale of Two Theories.Mark Windsor - 2020 - Philosophy and Literature 44 (1):35-51.
Foucault and the Enigma of the Monster.Luciano Nuzzo - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (1):55-72.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-09-28

Total views
3 ( #1,334,512 of 2,461,926 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,013 of 2,461,926 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes