Public Health Ethics 5 (2):116-127 (2012)

Drink driving causes great suffering and material destruction. The alcohol interlock promises to eradicate this problem by technological design. Traditional counter-measures to drink driving such as policing and punishment and information campaigns have proven insufficient. Extensive policing is expensive and intrusive. Severe punishment is disproportionate to the risks created in most single cases. If the interlock becomes inexpensive and convenient enough, and if there are no convincing moral objections to the device, it may prove the only feasible as well as the only justifiable solution to the problem of drink driving. A policy of universal alcohol interlocks, in all cars, has been proposed by several political parties in Sweden and is supported by the National Road Administration and the 2006 Alcohol Interlock Commission. This article assesses two possible moral objections to a policy of universal interlocks: (i) that it displaces the responsibility of individual drivers and (ii) that it constitutes a paternalistic interference with drivers. The first objection is found unconvincing, while the second has only limited bite and may be neutralized if paternalism is accepted for the sake of greater net liberty. Given the expected technological development, the proposed policy seems a commendable health promotion measure for the near future
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/phe/phs015
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Taking Risks, Assessing Responsibility.Gerald Dworkin - 1981 - Hastings Center Report 11 (5):26-31.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why Not Road Ethics?Meshi Ori - 2020 - Theoria 86 (3):389-412.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Paternalism in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.Carson Strong - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
Paternalism.Kalle Grill - 2011 - In Ruth Chadwick (ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. Academic Press.
Heavy Drinking on Campus and University Paternalism.Rick Momeyer - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):147-151.
The Legalization of Drugs. [REVIEW]Kalle Grill - 2007 - Theoria 73 (4):248-255.
The Normative Core of Paternalism.Kalle Grill - 2007 - Res Publica 13 (4):441-458.
Paternalism and Democracy.Marion Smiley - 1989 - Journal of Value Inquiry 23 (4):299-318.
Paternalism and Corporate Responsibility.David Crossley - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 21 (4):291 - 302.


Added to PP index

Total views
557 ( #15,386 of 2,506,503 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #28,101 of 2,506,503 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes