On Omniscience and a 'Set of All Truths': A Reply to Bringsjord

Analysis 50 (4):271 - 276 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Similar books and articles

Grim’s arguments against omniscience and indefinite extensibility.Laureano Luna - 2012 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 72 (2):89-101.
Grim on Logic and Omniscience.Selmer Bringsjord - 1989 - Analysis 49 (4):186 - 189.
``Unknowable Truths and Omniscience: A Reply to Kvanvig".Charles Taliaferro - 1993 - Journal of the American Academy of Religion 61:553-566.
The Analogy Argument for a Limited Acccount of Omniscience.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 1989 - International Philosophical Quarterly 29 (2):129-138.
Divine omniscience and knowledge de se.Yujin Nagasawa - 2003 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 53 (2):73-82.
Is omniscience impossible?Rik Peels - 2013 - Religious Studies 49 (4):481-490.
Omniscience and maximal power.Thomas Metcalf - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (3):289-306.
Reply to Bringsjord and Ferrucci.André Thayse - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (2):311-312.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
448 (#41,623)

6 months
92 (#44,707)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patrick Grim
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

Theism and Dialetheism.A. J. Cotnoir - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):592-609.
Sets and worlds again.Christopher Menzel - 2012 - Analysis 72 (2):304-309.
The intoxicating effects of conciliatory omniscience.David McElhoes - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (7):2151-2167.

Add more citations

References found in this work

There is no set of all truths.Patrick Grim - 1984 - Analysis 44 (4):206-208.
.Richard Swinburne - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
On Sets and Worlds: A Reply to Menzel.Patrick Grim - 1986 - Analysis 46 (4):186 - 191.
On Set Theoretic Possible Worlds.Christopher Menzel - 1986 - Analysis 46 (2):68 - 72.

View all 8 references / Add more references