Determining transformation distance in similarity: Considerations for assessing representational changes a priori

Thinking and Reasoning 18 (1):59 - 80 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The representational distortion (RD) approach to similarity (e.g., Hahn, Chater, & Richardson, 2003) proposes that similarity is computed using the transformation distance between two entities. We argue that researchers who adopt this approach need to be concerned with how representational transformations can be determined a priori. We discuss several roadblocks to using this approach. Specifically we demonstrate the difficulties inherent in determining what transformations are psychologically salient and the importance of considering the directionality of transformations

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Measure of Knowledge.Nick Treanor - 2012 - Noûs 47 (3):577-601.
In search of radical similarity.Oscar Vilarroya - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):35-35.
The Creation of Similarity: A Discussion of Metaphor in Light of Tversky's Theory of Similarity.Eva Feder Kittay - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:394 - 405.
Evolution.Robert N. Brandon - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (1):96-109.
Objective Similarity and Mental Representation.Alistair M. C. Isaac - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):683-704.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-22

Downloads
26 (#596,950)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations