Author’s response

Metascience 8 (1):49-62 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The air of consensus in these reviews is, as McNaughton notes, methodological. The future of philosophical emotion theory is in synthesising what a wide range of science has to tell us and using this to reflect on the nature of mind in general. In this respect the philosophy of emotion has been seriously out of step with the rest of a very exciting contemporary scene in the philosophy of mind. Whatever the shortcomings of my own attempt to bring the philosophy of emotion into contact with the rest of the discipline, I predict that this ‘reclaimed land’ will prove fertile

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Current Emotion Research in Philosophy.Paul E. Griffiths - 2013 - Emotion Review 5 (2):215-222.
The Natural Kind Status of Emotion.Louis C. Charland - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (4):511-37.
Emotion, Value, and the Ambiguous Honor of a Handbook.Remy Debes - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (2):273-285.
Defining Emotion: A Brief History.Maria Gendron - 2010 - Emotion Review 2 (4):371-372.
On Philosophy.Fedor Girenok - 2013 - Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):29-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
16 (#880,136)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Edmund Griffiths
University of Sydney

Citations of this work

An integration of motivation and cognition.Mark H. Bickhard - 2003 - In L. Smith, C. Rogers & P. Tomlinson (eds.), Development and Motivation: Joint Perspectives. Leicester: British Psychological Society. pp. 41-56.

Add more citations