Authors
Serge Grigoriev
Ithaca College
Abstract
The paper begins by introducing a heuristic distinction between the “dogmatist” and the “pragmatist” approaches to philosophy of history. Dogmatists tend to use history to exemplify and shore up their pre-existing philosophical convictions. Pragmatists, on the other hand, construe philosophy of history as a form of critical reflection on the actual historical practice, with epistemic criteria of proper practice emerging in the course of the research itself, not antecedently deduced from general philosophical considerations. The core of the paper discusses the work of Paul Roth, which is treated both as a specimen of the pragmatist mode of argumentation, and as a philosophical vindication, in the context of history, of the central pragmatist contention that we cannot successfully define knowledge in terms of a relation to reality, where reality is somehow understood independently and in advance of us knowing it. It is argued that Roth’s skillful deployment of arguments emerging from the recent philosophy of science to expose naïve realism in philosophy of history as a vestige of the no-longer-tenable philosophical vision opens a way for thinking productively about history as a complex and evolving form of research practice.
Keywords philosophy of history  pragmatism  philosophy of science
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dewey: A Pragmatist View of History.Serge Grigoriev - 2012 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (2):173-194.
Was James Ward a Cambridge Pragmatist?Jeremy Dunham - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (3):557-581.
Quine and Pragmatism.Heikki J. Koskinen & Sami Pihlström - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (3):309-346.
Hegel as a Pragmatist.Dina Emundts - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (4):611-631.
Old Pragmatisms, New Histories.Douglas Anderson - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (4):pp. 489-521.
The American Pragmatists.Cheryl Misak - 2013 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Quine and Pragmatism.Heikki J. Koskinen & Sami Pihlström - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (3):309-346.
Pragmatist Epistemologies.Roberto Frega (ed.) - 2011 - Lexington books.
Nietzsche’s Pragmatic Genealogy of Justice.Matthieu Queloz - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (4):727-749.
Narcissism or Facts?Robert Piercey - 2017 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 11 (2):149-169.
Badania nad dziejami filozofii a historyzm.Jan Czerkawski - 2004 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 52 (2):97-108.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-01-30

Total views
210 ( #54,644 of 2,507,015 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #63,660 of 2,507,015 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes