The Translation of Bonhoeffer’s Ethics: A Response to Jennifer Moberly

Studies in Christian Ethics 23 (3):316-320 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Moberly’s article is based on the premise that the translation of Bonhoeffer’s Ethics in the Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works is a critical edition. This article discusses the nature of translation, why this premise is indefensible, and points out many problematic judgments that flow from it and related assumptions. While recognising that errors occur in translations, the response affirms the scholarly value of the translation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bonhoeffer on Modernity: "Sic et Non".Jean Bethke Elshtain - 2001 - Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (3):345 - 366.
A Response To Walter Moberly.Susan Parsons - 1990 - Studies in Christian Ethics 3 (1):30-32.
The christological ontology of reason.Ulrik Becker Nissen - 2007 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 48 (4):460-478.
Bonhoeffer and Open Theism.James B. Gould - 2003 - Philosophy and Theology 15 (1):57-91.
Book Review: Ethics and the Old Testament. [REVIEW]Walter Moberly - 2005 - Studies in Christian Ethics 18 (2):125-125.
Ethics.Dietrich Bonhoeffer - 1955 - New York: Simon & Schuster. Edited by Eberhard Bethge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
28 (#556,922)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references