Authors
Hajo Greif
Warsaw University of Technology
Abstract
There have been attempts to subsume Charles Darwin's theory of evolution under either one of two distinct intellectual traditions: early Victorian natural science and its descendants in political economy (as exemplified by Herschel, Lyell, or Malthus) and the romantic approach to art and science emanating from Germany (as exemplified by Humboldt and Goethe). In this paper, it will be shown how these traditions may have jointly contributed to the design of Darwin's theory. The hypothesis is that their encounter created a particular tension in the conception of his theory which first opened up its characteristic field and mode of explanation. On the one hand, the domain of the explanandum was conceived of under a holistic and aesthetic view of nature that, in its combination with refined techniques of observation, was deeply indebted to Humboldt in particular. On the other hand, Darwin fashioned explanations for natural phenomena, so conceived, in order to identify their proper causes in a Herschelian spirit. The particular interaction between these two traditions in Darwin, it is concluded, paved the way for a transfer of the idea of causal laws to animate nature while salvaging the romantic idea of a complex, teleological and harmonious order of nature. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords Charles Darwin  Alexander von Humboldt  John F.W. Herschel  teleology in nature  aesthetics of nature  causal explanation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.07.003
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ontogeny and Phylogeny.Stephen Jay Gould - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (4):652-653.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Five Marks of the Mental.Tuomas K. Pernu - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
Humboldt, Darwin, and Romantic Resonance in Science.Xuansong Liu - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 92:196-208.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Morality?Benjamin Wiker - 2013 - In Stephen Dilley (ed.), Darwinian Evolution and Classical Liberalism: Theories in Tension. Lexington Books. pp. 31.
Rescuing Tracking Theories of Morality.Marc Artiga - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (12):3357-3374.
Darwinism and Environmentalism.Brian Garvey - 2011 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 69:67-82.
Can Darwinian Inheritance Be Extended From Biology to Epistemology?Carla E. Kary - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:356 - 369.
Getting Scientific with Religion:A Darwinian Solution... Or Not?Barak Morgan - 2010 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (3-4):192-230.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-03

Total views
123 ( #96,267 of 2,519,442 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #167,254 of 2,519,442 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes