Representing shape in sight and touch

Mind and Language 37 (4):694-714 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We represent shape in both sight and touch, but how do these abilities relate to one another? This issue has been discussed in the context of Molyneux's question of whether someone born blind could, upon being granted sight, identify shapes visually. Some have suggested that we might look to real‐world cases of sight restoration to illuminate the relation between visual and tactual shape representations. Here, I argue that newly sighted perceivers should not be relied on in this way because they are unlikely to form the kinds of shape representations responsible for cross‐modal recognition in normally sighted perceivers. I then argue that the available evidence makes a compelling case for the type identity view, on which the visual and tactual representations responsible for cross‐modal recognition are type‐identical.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Leibniz on Molyneux's Question.Brian Glenney - 2012 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (3):247-264.
The perception of shape.David H. Sanford - 1983 - In Carl Ginet & Sydney Shoemaker (eds.), Knowledge And Mind: Phil Essays. Oxford University Press.
Sight and touch.Michael Martin - 1992 - In Tim Crane (ed.), The Contents of Experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.
What was Molyneux's Question A Question About?Jonathan Cohen & Mohan Matthen - 2021 - In Molyneux's Question and the History of Philosophy. London: Routledge. pp. 325–344.
Berkeley on Space, Sight and Touch.D. G. Collingridge - 1978 - Philosophy 53 (203):102-105.
Touching pictures.Robert Hopkins - 2000 - British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (1):149-167.
De Descartes ą Athikté: métamorphoses du sensible chez Valéry.Thomas Vercruysse - 2012 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 5 (1).
The Tactual Ground, Immersion, and the “Space Between”.Clare Mac Cumhaill - 2017 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 55 (1):5-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-30

Downloads
75 (#200,928)

6 months
10 (#135,615)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

E. J. Green
Johns Hopkins University

Citations of this work

Spatial representations in sensory modalities.Tony Cheng - 2022 - Mind and Language 37 (3):485-500.
The language of tactile thought.Tony Cheng - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e270.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mental paint and mental latex.Ned Block - 1996 - Philosophical Issues 7:19-49.
New Essays on Human Understanding.G. W. Leibniz - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (3):489-490.
Molyneux's question.Gareth Evans - 1985 - In Collected papers. New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 19 references / Add more references