Refocusing on the data: A reply to Hardman

Thinking and Reasoning 4 (1):95 – 96 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Hardman in press claims that the results of Green and Larking 1995 favour a mental rules theory account of performance in the selection task over a mental model theory account. This reply rebuts his claim.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,898

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy of sport: international perspectives.Alun Hardman & Carwyn Jones (eds.) - 2010 - Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Mental models in data interpretation.Clark A. Chinn & William F. Brewer - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):219.
Empirical data sets are algorithmically compressible: Reply to McAllister.Charles Twardy, Steve Gardner & David Dowe - 2005 - Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, Part A 36 (2):391-402.
Book reviews. [REVIEW]Malcolm Hardman - 1978 - British Journal of Aesthetics 18 (1):94-94.
Ruskin's ‘massy commonsense’.M. Hardman - 1976 - British Journal of Aesthetics 16 (2):137-143.
Physical and mental? Reply to John Searle.Anthonie W. M. Meijers - 2000 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 8 (2):179 – 183.


Added to PP

37 (#329,275)

6 months
1 (#479,521)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references