International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8 (1):45 – 50 (1994)
AbstractAbstract In order to be a general theory of human cognition, the theory of mental models needs to accommodate a variety of forms of reasoning in addition to deduction. The mental model theory of induction is a crucial step in establishing generality. After suggesting that the theory of mental models can also account for abduction and analogy, the paper points out that inductive performance is likely to be constrained both by the nature of the representation used and by strategic factors. Since human cognition involves the communication of arguments, a final section explores the relationship between the theory of mental models and the notion of an argument. It proposes that models can contain tokens of inductive arguments which can be referred to in the course of other arguments
Similar books and articles
A model theory of induction.Philip N. Johnson‐Laird - 1994 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8 (1):5 – 29.
Finite injury and Σ1-induction.Michael Mytilinaios - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (1):38 - 49.
Discussion de-focusing on the Wason selection task: Mental models or mental inference rules? A commentary on green and larking (1995).David K. Hardman - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (1):83 – 94.
Models as make-believe.Adam Toon - 2010 - In Roman Frigg & Matthew Hunter (eds.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science. Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science.
Models in science and mental models in scientists and nonscientists.William F. Brewer - 2001 - Mind and Society 2 (2):33-48.
Induction and reasoning to the best explanation.Richard A. Fumerton - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (4):589-600.
Deduction and induction: Reasoning through mental models. [REVIEW]Bruno G. Bara & Monica Bucciarelli - 2000 - Mind and Society 1 (1):95-107.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The cognitive processes in informal reasoning.Victoria F. Shaw - 1996 - Thinking and Reasoning 2 (1):51 – 80.
Judging the plausibility of arguments in scientific texts: a student–scientist comparison.Sarah von der Mühlen, Tobias Richter, Sebastian Schmid, Elisabeth Marie Schmidt & Kirsten Berthold - 2016 - Thinking and Reasoning 22 (2):221-249.
References found in this work
Bias in Human Reasoning: Causes and Consequences.Jonathan St B. T. Evans (ed.) - 1989 - Psychology Press.
Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing.Joshua Klayman & Young-won Ha - 1987 - Psychological Review 94 (2):211-228.
Patterns, Thinking, and Cognition: A Theory of Judgment.Howard Margolis - 1987 - University of Chicago Press.
Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words.Jill H. Larkin & Herbert A. Simon - 1987 - Cognitive Science 11 (1):65-100.