Ethics and HRM

Business and Professional Ethics Journal 30 (3-4):269-292 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The development of an ethical perspective of HRM that is both employee centered and explicitly normative and, as such, distinct from dominant and criticalperspectives of HRM has progressed in recent years. Reliance on the traditional “threesome” of rights/justice theories, deontology and consequentialism, however, has limited debate to micro-level issues and the search for a “solution.” By understanding the employment relationship as a stakeholder relationship, we open the ethical analysis of HRM to the pluralism and pragmatism that stakeholder theory has to offer. In doing this, we can address both the broader need for HRM to offer a more comprehensive account of our humanity and the specific requisite for HRM to treat employees as moral persons with “names and faces.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics and HRM Education.Harry J. Van Buren & Michelle Greenwood - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (1):1-15.
Ethics and HRM: A review and conceptual analysis. [REVIEW]Michelle R. Greenwood - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 36 (3):261 - 278.
In Defence of Stakeholder Pragmatism.Tommy Jensen & Johan Sandström - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 114 (2):225-237.
Earth.Edward Stead & Jean Garner - 2000 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2:231-244.
The Politics of Stakeholder Theory.R. Edward Freeman - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):409-421.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-18

Downloads
44 (#353,833)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Edward Freeman
University of Virginia

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references