- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Biotechnology: Plants and Animals
In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks, A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 402–405 (2012)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Intrinsic Value Environmental and Health Risks Human Hunger and Benefit‐sharing References and Further Reading.Author's Profile
biotechnology ‐ plants and animals fundamental ethical concerns of biotechnology ‐ respect for nature, and naturalness, often are called “intrinsic” environmental and health risks Straughan referring to ethical concerns about consequences of development and use of genetically modified organisms human hunger and benefit‐sharing according to some calculations, the world population will have grown to 10 billion people in 2050
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Risks associated with genetic modification: – An annotated bibliography of Peer reviewed natural science publications. [REVIEW]Sean A. Weaver & Michael C. Morris - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (2):157-189.
Ethical Issues Concerning Genetically Modified Animals for the Study of Human Diseases.Eduardo Rodríguez Yunta - 2023 - In Erick Valdés & Juan Alberto Lecaros, Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume I: Decisions at the Bench. Springer Verlag. pp. 513-525.
Ethical, cultural and spiritual objections to genetically modified organisms: a review of the New Zealand process and perspective. [REVIEW]Jean S. Fleming - 2004 - Alternatives to Laboratory Animals: ATLA 32:21-27.
Biosafety Act 2007: Does It Really Protect Bioethical Issues Relating To GMOS. [REVIEW]Siti Hafsyah Idris, Lee Wei Chang & Azizan Baharuddin - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (4):747-757.
Creating and Patenting New Life Forms.Nils Holtug - 1998 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer, A Companion to Bioethics. Malden, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 235–244.
Reconstruction of the Ethical Debate on Naturalness in Discussions About Plant-Biotechnology.P. F. Haperen, B. Gremmen & J. Jacobs - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (6):797-812.
A Framework for Thawing Value Conflicts in the GMO Debate.Samantha Noll - 2020 - In Shannon Vallor, The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Usa. pp. 50-90.
Agriculture Ethics.David M. Kaplan - 2012 - In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks, A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 384–386.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-06-29
Downloads
14 (#1,386,454)
6 months
3 (#1,189,755)
2013-06-29
Downloads
14 (#1,386,454)
6 months
3 (#1,189,755)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-cbsf4 uwo