A Public Survey on Handling Male Chicks in the Dutch Egg Sector

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (1):93-107 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 2035 global egg demand will have risen 50% from 1985. Because we are not able to tell in the egg whether it will become a male or female chick, billons of one day-old male chicks will be killed. International research initiatives are underway in this area, and governments encourage the development of an alternative with the goal of eliminating the culling of day-old male chicks. The Netherlands holds an exceptional position in the European egg trade, but is also the only country in the European Union where the downside of the egg sector, the practice of killing day-old male chicks, is a recurrent subject of societal debate. ‘Preventing the killing of young animals’ and ‘in ovo sex determination’ are the two alternative approaches available to solve this problem. It is clear that both approaches solve the problem of killing day-old male chicks, either by keeping them alive or by preventing them from living, but they also raise a lot of new animal welfare-related dilemmas. A thorough analysis was undertaken of these dilemmas and the results are presented in this article. The analysis resulted in an ethical framework based on the two main approaches in bioethics: a consequentialist approach and a deontological approach. This ethical framework was used to develop an online survey administered to ascertain Dutch public opinion about these alternative approaches. The results show that neither alternative will be fully accepted, or accepted by more than half of Dutch society. However, the survey does provide an insight into the motives that are important for people’s choice: food safety and a good treatment of animals. Irrespective of the approach chosen, these values should be safeguarded and communicated clearly.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Not So Happy Hens.Andrew Linzey & Clair Linzey - 2022 - Journal of Animal Ethics 12 (1):v-vi.
Killing Animals in Animal Shelters.Clare Alexandra Palmer - 2006 - In Palmer Clare Alexandra, Killing Animals, edited by The Animal Studies Group. Illinois University Press. pp. 170-187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-16

Downloads
476 (#67,055)

6 months
137 (#43,210)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Bart Gremmen
Wageningen University and Research
Vincent Blok
Wageningen University and Research

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2004 - Univ of California Press.
The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn, Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.

View all 11 references / Add more references