Against Chierchia's computational account of scalar implicatures

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1pt3):373-384 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Recent theories of scalar implicature, such as that proposed by Gennaro Chierchia, have sought to bring them within the domain of compositional semantic theory. These approaches contrast with standard pragmatic explanations of the phenomena in that implicatures are calculated by default and are computed locally. One motivation for Chierchia's approach, the purported connection between the computation of scalar implicatures and 'any'-licensing polarity items, is shown to be weak. Difficulties are then presented for his approach which are not shared by the pragmatic theory.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,377

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

67 (#207,841)

6 months
4 (#244,740)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Generically free choice.Bernhard Nickel - 2010 - Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (6):479-512.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Studies in the way of words.Herbert Paul Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
A Natural History of Negation.Laurence R. Horn - 1989 - University of Chicago Press.
The Causal Theory of Perception.H. P. Grice & Alan R. White - 1961 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 35 (1):121-168.

View all 12 references / Add more references