Oxford University Press UK (2017)
AbstractDoes the morality of abortion depend on the moral status of the human fetus? Must the law of abortion presume an answer to the question of when personhood begins? Can a law which permits late abortion but not infanticide be morally justified? These are just some of the questions this book sets out to address. With an extended analysis of the moral and legal status of abortion, Kate Greasley offers an alternative account to the reputable arguments of Ronald Dworkin and Judith Jarvis Thomson and instead brings the philosophical notion of 'personhood' to the foreground of this debate. Structured in three parts, the book will consider the relevance of prenatal personhood for the moral and legal evaluation of abortion; trace the key features of the conventional debate about when personhood begins and explore the most prominent issues in abortion ethics literature: the human equality problem and the difference between abortion and infanticide; and examine abortion law and regulation as well as the differing attitudes to selective abortion. The book concludes with a snapshot into the current controversy surrounding the scope of the right to conscientiously object to participation in abortion provision.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Even If the Fetus is Not a Person, Abortion is Immoral: The Impairment Argument.Perry Hendricks - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (2):245-253.
Neonatal Incubator or Artificial Womb? Distinguishing Ectogestation and Ectogenesis Using the Metaphysics of Pregnancy.Elselijn Kingma & Suki Finn - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (4):354-363.
My Body, Not My Choice: Against Legalised Abortion.Perry Hendricks - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (7):456-460.
Artificial Wombs, Birth, and "Birth": A Response to Romanis.Nicholas Colgrove - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics:medethics-2019-105845.
Artificial Womb Technology and the Significance of Birth: Why Gestatelings Are Not Newborns.Elizabeth Chloe Romanis - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (11):728-731.
Similar books and articles
Limitations on Personhood Arguments for Abortion and 'After-Birth Abortion'.Anthony Wrigley - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):15-18.
Is Abortion a Question of Personal Morality?Julie Kirsch - 2013 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):91-99.
Doubts About a Classic Defence of Abortion.Jo Difford - 2011 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 17 (1):122-129.
Personhood, Harm and Interest: A Reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva.Matthew Beard & Sandra Lynch - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):1-4.
The Problems with Utilitarian Conceptions of Personhood in the Abortion Debate.Daniel R. A. Cox - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (5):318-320.
Avoiding the Personhood Issue: Abortion, Identity, and Marquis's ‘Future‐Like‐Ours’ Argument.Eric Reitan - 2016 - Bioethics 30 (4):272-281.
Preventing Abortion as a Test Case for the Justifiability of Violence.Robert Audi - 1997 - The Journal of Ethics 1 (2):141-163.
Reinterpreting the 'Quickening' Perspective in the Abortion Debate.Farrokh B. Sekaleshfar - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (2):161-171.
Personhood, Potentiality, and Abortion.Tom L. Huffman - 1991 - Dissertation, University of Missouri - Columbia
Abortion and Assent.Rosamond Rhodes - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):416-427.
Personhood, Property Rights, and the Permissibility of Abortion.Paul A. Roth - 1983 - Law and Philosophy 2 (2):163 - 191.
Of Course the Baby Should Live: Against 'After-Birth Abortion'.Regina A. Rini - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):353-356.