Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (2):275-289 (2012)

Authors
James Grant
Oxford University
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explain why imaginativeness is valuable. Recent discussions of imaginativeness or creativity (which I regard as the same property) have paid relatively little attention to this important question. My discussion has three parts. First, I elucidate the concept of imaginativeness by providing three conditions a product or act must satisfy in order to be imaginative. This account enables us to explain, among other things, why imaginativeness is associated with inspiration, why it is associated with the faculty of imagination, and why it is relative to persons and to contexts. Second, in the light of this account, I say what the imaginativeness of persons is. Philosophical discussions of the imaginativeness of persons usually treat it as a capacity. In fact, it is a tendency or disposition of a certain kind. Third, I give reasons why the imaginativeness of persons has the value it does. I begin by saying what the basic facts about its value are. When a person's imaginativeness is valuable, it is either (i) a good thing about a person, (ii) good for the person, or (iii) good for others. I provide explanations of each of these facts. I conclude by addressing the difficult question of whether a person's imaginativeness is non-instrumentally good for her. On Romantic and Romantic-inspired views, imaginativeness is non-instrumentally good for a person because of its connection with self-realization. I reject this claim. However, I argue that, often, imaginativeness is indeed non-instrumentally good for the imaginative person
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/00048402.2011.574143
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Ethics of Authenticity.Charles Taylor - 1992 - Harvard University Press.
Liberty.Isaiah Berlin (ed.) - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
The Philosophy of Creativity.Berys Gaut - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (12):1034-1046.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Against Creativity.Alison Hills & Alexander Bird - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (3):694-713.
Mixed Motivations: Creativity as a Virtue.Berys Gaut - 2014 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 75:183-202.
Creativity as an Artistic Merit.James Grant - 2018 - In Berys Gaut & Matthew Kieran (eds.), Creativity and Philosophy. London: pp. 333-349.
Teaching scientific creativity through philosophy of science.Rasmus Jaksland - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (4):1-17.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Peter Abelard: Collationes.Peter Abelard (ed.) - 2001 - Clarendon Press.
Internalism About a Person’s Good: Don’T Believe It.Alexander Sarch - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (2):161-184.
The Uniqueness of Persons.Linda Zagzebski - 2001 - Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (3):401 - 423.
Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Personhood.Rita C. Manning - 1984 - Journal of Business Ethics 3 (1):77 - 84.
Empathy, Sympathy, Care.Stephen L. Darwall - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 89 (2-3):261–282.
On Becoming a Person.John Barresi - 1999 - Philosophical Psychology 12 (1):79-98.
Trust and the Trickster Problem.Zac Cogley - 2012 - Analytic Philosophy 53 (1):30-47.
The Limits of the Explanatory Power of Developmentalism.David Sobel - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (4):517-527.
What’s Wrong with Moorean Buck-Passing?Francesco Orsi - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (3):727-746.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-07-12

Total views
91 ( #128,222 of 2,506,511 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,511 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes