The Hermeneutic Role of a Book Review: A Response to Glover

The Pluralist 8 (2):113-116 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The primary function of a book review is to articulate and present an understanding of the book's thesis and argument, and to make a judgment as to its value, so that readers will themselves understand and be guided by the understanding and judgment of the reviewer. Reviews are supposed to be interpretations created for the sake of a potential audience for a book. Unfortunately, most reviews fail to fulfill this function insofar as they merely paraphrase the text they are supposed to interpret, fail to provide an understanding of it, or are so critical that they miss the significance of the book. In short, they fail to provide the kind of interpretation that constitutes their proper hermeneutic task. Glover's ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Book reviews. [REVIEW]Howard J. Curzer & Jacqueline Glover - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (1).
Review Essays: Keynes and Macroeconomics after 70 Years.Thomas Francis - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (2):269-277.
What is Postmetaphysics? Zabala on the Question of Being.William Smith - 2010 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (1):117-131.
Life as understanding.Günter Figal - 2004 - Research in Phenomenology 34 (1):20-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-02

Downloads
101 (#168,438)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jorge J. E. Gracia
State University of New York, Buffalo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references