- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Towards an adequate definition of species within the framework of evolutionary biology, genetics, and phylogenetic systematics, which is empirically testable, generally applicable and mindful of existing concepts, yet which avoids their weaknesses
Abstract
M.A. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 2014.Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
My notes
Similar books and articles
Reflections on Systematics and Phylogenetic Reconstruction.Jeffrey H. Schwartz - 2009 - Acta Biotheoretica 57 (1-2):295-305.
On the integrated frameworks of species concepts: Mayden's hierarchy of species concepts and de Queiroz's unified concept of species.Naomi Shun-Ichiro - 2011 - Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 49 (3):177-184.
Systematics and the Darwinian revolution.Kevin de Queiroz - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (2):238-259.
Systematics and the Darwinian Revolution.Kevin De Queiroz - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (2):238-259.
Species as Explanatory Hypotheses: Refinements and Implications.Kirk Fitzhugh - 2009 - Acta Biotheoretica 57 (1-2):201-248.
Using the logical basis of phylogenetics as the framework for teaching biology.Charles Morphy D. Santos & Adolfo R. Calor - unknown
Species concepts should not conflict with evolutionary history, but often do.Joel D. Velasco - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (4):407-414.
What can the axiomatization of cladistics teach us about its relationships to evolutionary biology?Sophie Pécaud - unknown
Population thinking and tree thinking in systematics.Robert J. O'Hara - 1997 - Zoologica Scripta 26 (4): 323–329.
Species concepts and the ontology of evolution.Joel Cracraft - 1987 - Biology and Philosophy 2 (3):329-346.
When monophyly is not enough: Exclusivity as the key to defining a phylogenetic species concept.Joel D. Velasco - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (4):473-486.
Species monophyly.Olivier Rieppel - 2009 - Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 48 (1):1-8.
The So-Called Extended Synthesis and Population Genetics.Lindsay R. Craig - 2010 - Biological Theory 5 (2):117-123.
The So-Called Extended Synthesis and Population Genetics.Lindsay R. Craig - 2010 - Biological Theory 5 (2):117-123.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-06-12
Downloads
11 (#1,075,532)
6 months
3 (#902,269)
2021-06-12
Downloads
11 (#1,075,532)
6 months
3 (#902,269)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo