Siegel on Competency Testing and Critical Thinking

Informal Logic 14 (2) (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Harvey Siegel argues that minimum competency testing (MCT) is incompatible with strong sense critical thinking. His arguments are reviewed and contrasted with positions held by John E. McPeck and Michael Scriven. Siegel's arguments seem directed against the prevailing form of MCT. However, alternative formats which allow for the aggregate and context-sensitive nature of critical thinking are not doomed to the arbitrariness Siegel finds. MCT may be a legitimate and useful means for furthering critical thinking as one of our educational ideals

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
46 (#301,126)

6 months
2 (#648,997)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

McPeck's mistakes.Richard Paul - 1985 - Informal Logic 7 (1).
General Information.[author unknown] - 1973 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 3 (2):140-140.
General Information.[author unknown] - 1971 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 1 (2):134-134.

Add more references