Critical Horizons 17 (1):53-65 (2016)
AbstractThis paper argues that cosmopolitan law has been more successfully achieved not by appeal to a supra-state authority or community, but by the development of features of existing treaty law. Specifically, it shows how the International Criminal Court's jurisdiction over serious human rights violations has been extended to the citizens and territories of non-member states – and even to otherwise immune state officials – not by challenging the sovereignty of non-member states directly, but on the basis of member states’ own territorial sovereignty and the universal jurisdiction which they delegate to the Court and to the United Nations Security Council. In light of this, the authors argue that cosmopolitanism is better conceived not as invoking an independent sense of global community that supersedes and constrains state sovereignty, but as an immanent, contingent and creative development of statist criminal law itself, rooted in its principles of state sovereignty
Similar books and articles
Delegation of Powers and Authority in International Criminal Law.Shlomit Wallerstein - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (1):123-140.
Jasper's Kangaroo Court Of International Injustice: A Response.Eric Smaw - 2003 - Florida Philosophical Review 3 (2):45-61.
Challenging Sovereignty? The USA and the Establishment of the International Criminal Court.Marlene Wind - 2009 - Ethics and Global Politics 2 (2):83-108.
Non-international Armed Conflict as War Crime within the Jurisdiction of ICC.Xiu-mei Wang - 2007 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:133-140.
The Domestic Influence of International Criminal Tribunals: The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the Creation of the State Court of Bosnia & Herzegovina.William W. Burke-White - manuscript
Reservations in Declarations accepting Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (article in Lithuanian).Rytis Satkauskas - 2011 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 18 (2):517-546.
International Criminal Law and Philosophy.Larry May & Zachary Hoskins (eds.) - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
Disputes Between Members States of the European Union and Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union.Inga Daukšienė - 2011 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 18 (4):1349-1368.
Recognition of Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union in International Courts.Inga Daukšienė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (2):459-475.
Retribution but No Recompense: A Critique of the Torturer's Immunity From Civil Suit.Jane Wright - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (1):143-178.
A Reductio Ad Absurdum of Restricted, Tribal Criminal Jurisdiction.Clifton Perry - 2004 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):253-262.
The Right to Life: A Guide to the Implementation of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights.Douwe Korff - unknown
Sovereignty: The State, the Individual, and the International Legal System in the Twenty First Century.Ronald A. Brand - unknown
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Cosmopolitan Democracy: Paths and Agents.Daniele Archibugi & David Held - 2011 - Ethics and International Affairs 25 (4):433-461.
Kant’s Theory of Cosmopolitanism and Hegel’s Critique.Robert Fine - 2003 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (6):609-630.