Philosophy Research Archives 12:449-470 (1986)
| Abstract |
Several epistemologists have recently urged the adoption of what I call a “no-fault” approach to the justification of beliefs. I argue that these views fall prey to objections raised by Alvin Goldman against internalism, specifically: they assume an initial set of regulative principles. It is also suggested that the way to avoid Goldman’s objections is through a psychologistic account of initial warrant.
|
| Keywords | Contemporary Philosophy History of Philosophy |
| Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
| ISBN(s) | 0164-0771 |
| DOI | pra1986/19871211 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
No-Fault Theories of Regulative Justification.Anthony J. Graybosch - 1986 - Philosophy Research Archives 12:449-470.
Alvin I. Goldman's Account of Justification.Jae-Kyung Kim - 1996 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
The Debate About Truth: Pragmatism Without Regulative Ideas.Albrecht Wellmer - 2003 - Critical Horizons 4 (1):29-54.
The Comparability of Scientific Theories.Carl R. Kordig - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (4):467-485.
Kant and the Subject of Critique: On the Regulative Role of the Psychological Idea.Avery Goldman - 2012 - Indiana University Press.
Suppositional Reasoning and Perceptual Justification.Stewart Cohen - 2016 - Logos and Episteme 7 (2):215-219.
Is Kant (W)Right? – On Kant’s Regulative Ideas and Wright’s Entitlements.Jochen Briesen - 2013 - Kant-Yearbook 5 (1):1-32.
What's Wrong with Reliability Theories of Justification?Stephen Robert Jacobson - 1989 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
Causal Reference and Epistemic Justification.Jane Duran - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (2):272-279.
Goldman on Evidence and Reliability.Jack C. Lyons - 2016 - In H. Kornblith & B. McLaughlin (eds.), Goldman and his Critics. Blackwell.
A Critical Examination of BonJour’s, Haack’s, and Dancy’s Theory of Empirical Justification.Dionysis Christias - 2015 - Logos and Episteme 6 (1): 7-34.
Foundational Beliefs and the Structure of Justification.Kenneth Hobson - 2008 - Synthese 164 (1):117 - 139.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-02-15
Total views
7 ( #1,072,112 of 2,520,436 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,436 )
2017-02-15
Total views
7 ( #1,072,112 of 2,520,436 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,436 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
