Mind 131 (522):429-458 (2022)

Authors
Aidan Gray
University of Illinois, Chicago
Abstract
Among the virtues of relationist approaches to Frege’s puzzle is that they put us in a position to outline structural features of the puzzle that were only implicit in earlier work. In particular, they allow us to frame questions about the relation between the explanatory roles of sense and sameness of sense. In this paper, I distinguish a number of positions about that relation which have not been clearly distinguished. This has a few pay-offs. It allows us to shed light on recent controversies about the ‘essential indexical’, and it also allows us to see what’s at stake between relationists and their opponents. When we see what’s at stake, we can see that we have reason to adopt an account of cognitive significance that incorporates elements of both relationist and Fregean approaches.
Keywords frege's puzzle  sense  relationism  essential indexical
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/fzab076
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reference and Consciousness.J. Campbell - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Attitudes de Dicto and de Se.David Lewis - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (4):513-543.
Mental Files.François Recanati - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
A Puzzle About Belief.Saul A. Kripke - 1979 - In A. Margalit (ed.), Meaning and Use. Reidel. pp. 239--83.

View all 68 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Fregeanism, Sententialism, and Scope.Harvey Lederman - forthcoming - Linguistics and Philosophy:1-41.
Indistinguishable Senses.Aidan Gray - 2020 - Noûs 54 (1):78-104.
The Ontological Implications of Neo-Fregeanism.María de Ponte - 2016 - Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 69:159-174.
Defending the Defense.Bryan Frances - 1999 - Mind 108 (431):563-566.
Hale and Wright on the Metaontology of Neo-Fregeanism.Matti Eklund - 2016 - In Marcus Rossberg & Philip A. Ebert (eds.), Abstractionism.
Relational Approaches to Frege's Puzzle.Aidan Gray - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (10):e12429.
Pleonastic Fregeanism.Stephen Schiffer - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:1-15.
Composition as Abstraction.Jeffrey Sanford Russell - 2017 - Journal of Philosophy 114 (9):453-470.
N Eo-F Regeanism and Q Uantifier V Ariance.Katherine Hawley - 2007 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 81 (1):233-249.
Cognitive Significance.Aidan Gray - 2021 - In Stephen Biggs & Heimir Geirsson (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Reference. New York, NY, USA:
A Hyperimmune Minimal Degree and an ANR 2-Minimal Degree.Mingzhong Cai - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (4):443-455.
On the Very Idea of a Minimal Proposition.Hsiu-Lin Ku - 2017 - NTU Philosophical Review 53:35-74.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-12-22

Total views
117 ( #98,517 of 2,498,003 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
117 ( #5,758 of 2,498,003 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes