Defending millianism

Mind 108 (431):555-561 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Millianism is the view that all there is to the meaning of a name is its bearer. In a recent paper Bryan Frances seeks to undercut the traditional argument against Millianism as well as offer a new argument in favor of Millianism. I argue that both endeavors fail.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Recurrence.Nathan Salmon - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 159 (3):407-441.
Defending the Defense.Bryan Frances - 1999 - Mind 108 (431):563-566.
Beyond Millianism.Leo Iacono - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (3):423 - 436.
The One and Only Argument for Radical Millianism.Max Deutsch - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (3):427-445.
The price of innocent millianism.Stefano Predelli - 2004 - Erkenntnis 60 (3):335-356.
The Resilience of Illogical Belief.Nathan Salmon - 2006 - Noûs 40 (2):369–375.
Gappy propositions?Seyed N. Mousavian - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):125-157.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
105 (#163,094)

6 months
16 (#149,874)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Graham
University of California, Riverside

Citations of this work

Defending the Defense.Bryan Frances - 1999 - Mind 108 (431):563-566.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references