Discourse analysis of academic debate of ethics for AGI

AI and Society 37 (4):1519-1532 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Artificial general intelligence is a greatly anticipated technology with non-trivial existential risks, defined as machine intelligence with competence as great/greater than humans. To date, social scientists have dedicated little effort to the ethics of AGI or AGI researchers. This paper employs inductive discourse analysis of the academic literature of two intellectual groups writing on the ethics of AGI—applied and/or ‘basic’ scientific disciplines henceforth referred to as technicians (e.g., computer science, electrical engineering, physics), and philosophy-adjacent disciplines henceforth referred to as PADs (e.g., philosophy, theology, anthropology). These groups agree that AGI ethics is fundamentally about mitigating existential risk. They highlight our moral obligation to future generations, demonstrate the ethical importance of better understanding consciousness, and endorse a hybrid of deontological/utilitarian normative ethics. Technicians favor technocratic AGI governance, embrace the project of ‘solving’ moral realism, and are more deontologically inclined than PADs. PADs support a democratic approach to AGI governance, are more skeptical of deontology, consider current AGI predictions as fundamentally imprecise, and are wary of using AGI for moral fact-finding.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of “Following Nature” in Forestry.Nicole Klenk - 2009 - Environmental Ethics 31 (1):67-84.
Teaching Ethics.Jim Wishloff - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 2 (1):71-96.
Discourse Ethics and Nature.Angelika Krebs - 1997 - Environmental Values 6 (3):269-279.
Ethics, academic freedom and academic tenure.Richard T. De George - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (1):11-25.
Teaching Ethics.Jim Wishloff - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 2 (1):71-96.
Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.Vincent C. Müller - 2021 - In Anthony Elliott (ed.), The Routledge social science handbook of AI. London: Routledge. pp. 122-137.
From machine ethics to computational ethics.Samuel T. Segun - 2021 - AI and Society 36 (1):263-276.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-12

Downloads
30 (#459,346)

6 months
8 (#157,827)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What do philosophers believe?David Bourget & David J. Chalmers - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (3):465-500.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Thinking, Fast and Slow.Daniel Kahneman - 2011 - New York: New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies.Nick Bostrom (ed.) - 2014 - Oxford University Press.
Computing machinery and intelligence.Alan M. Turing - 1950 - Mind 59 (October):433-60.

View all 45 references / Add more references