Social Epistemology 19 (4):315 – 319 (2005)

This brief position paper explores our current confrontation with technology through a model of the accident. Focusing on failure, risk and malfunctioning technology, the paper offers the notion of disasterologies as an alternative approach to technology studies. Such an approach suggests both a less deterministic and instrumentalized drive than is often found in theories of technology and society as well as a less certain role of the subject in its relation to technology. Disasterologies re-imagines the accident as that which eludes the modern subject's mastery over the built environment through scientific knowledge and "technological rationality." By foregrounding when technology fails, disasterologies implies a subject neither entirely in control nor entirely at the mercy of technology, one whose condition of contingency re-opens questions of agency, intentionality, and subjectivity itself.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02691720500145381
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,265
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Knowing Machines: Essays on Technical Change.Donald Mackenzie - 1997 - Science and Society 61 (4):575-578.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Knowing Waste: Towards an Inhuman Epistemology.Myra J. Hird - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (3-4):453-469.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
16 ( #665,863 of 2,507,683 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,871 of 2,507,683 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes