Against strong speciesism

Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):107–118 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Speciesism, difference of treatment based on an appeal to species membership, is often likened to racism and sexism, and condemned on those grounds. Some philosophers, however, reject this argument by analogy and instead forward an argument for speciesism based on a postulated right of species to compete for survival. This paper attacks this strong form of speciesism by showing that the underlying concept of ‘species’ is incoherent in the context of morality, and that strong speciesism has unacceptable corollaries

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
332 (#58,513)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Defining speciesism.Oscar Horta & Frauke Albersmeier - 2020 - Philosophy Compass 15 (11):1-9.
Should we enhance animals?S. Chan - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (11):678-683.
Speciesism and Speciescentrism.Frauke Albersmeier - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (2):511-527.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references