Further Problems with Neoclassical Environmental Economics

Environmental Ethics 16 (2):161-171 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We examine the merits of neoclassical environmental economics and discuss alternative approaches to it. We argue that the basic assumptions of the neoclassical approach, embodied in the indifference curve, make that model inappropriate for environmental analysis. We begin by assuming that the basic postulates of the neoclassical model hold and then argue that even this ideal state is incompatible with environmental sustainability. We discuss the role of the discount rate, the exclusive emphasis on marginal choices, and the assumption of perfect information.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Progress and environmental sustainability.John M. Gowdy - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (1):41-55.
Unsustainable Growth, Unsustainable Capitalism.Petter Naess - 2006 - Journal of Critical Realism 5 (2):197-227.
Unsustainable Growth, Unsustainable Capitalism.Petter Næss - 2006 - Journal of Critical Realism 5 (2):197-227.
Environmental change, injustice and sustainability.Colin D. Butler - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (1):11-19.
On Locating Value in Making Moral Progress.Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (1):137-152.
On Progress in Philosophy.Vladimir V. Mironov - 2013 - Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):10-14.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
13 (#1,006,512)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references