Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (2):127-146 (2005)

Abstract
I explain the asymmetry between innocent aggressors and their victims, and attempt to separate justified and unjustified defensive force when both parties are innocent. I propose the principle of initiating behaviour, which states that: ‘In order for one person to be justified in using defensive force the other party must initiate the apparently threatening behaviour, but the defendant’s interpretation of that behaviour, as being threatening, would have to be reasonable.’ We can thereby maintain the view that there is a significant relation between an act being justified and which party ought eventually to be given priority in a conflict situation. If we know that an act is justified, we know that we have to give preference to its agent when there is a choice between imposing equal harm on him or her and his or her victim
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1740468105054338
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Killing the Innocent in Self-Defense.Michael Otsuka - 1994 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (1):74-94.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Killing Civilians.Gerhard Overland - 2005 - European Journal of Philosophy 13 (3):345-363.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
51 ( #224,305 of 2,519,871 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,671 of 2,519,871 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes