Abstract
I want to start this paper by drawing a distinction between two uses of the word ‘conscience’ in order to get clear just what it is I shall talk about. The distinction I want to make can perhaps best be brought out by reference to a type of situation which could equally well be described in one or other of two ways, each way illustrating one use of the word ‘conscience’. Suppose then that we have a man who has been brought up to think that it is a good thing to help the poor. This lesson he has been taught, at least in part, by being told stories about beggars asking for money. The good person gives money to the beggars and the wicked person callously refuses it. One year he decides to book himself a holiday in Spain. Before he goes, however, he has a conversation with a social scientist friend. This friend points out to him that the one thing he should not do when in Spain is give money to beggars. Beggary, he argues, is a social evil and one which will only be removed if people take a stand and refuse to go on giving money when asked. The appropriate action to take is to inform the beggar of the whereabouts of the local employment exchange, or take him along to an employer, or do one or other of various rather embarrassing things. If the worst comes to the worst, it is better simply to walk away than to give money. Our man goes to Spain convinced by this argument and realising the unsophisticated and over-simple nature of his earlier moral approach. Before long, a beggar comes up to him and asks for money. Let's suppose that he refuses to give it, because of his newly acquired conviction. Now it seems to me that when he returns he could describe this situation in one or other of two ways without there being any difference as regards the facts that he is asserting
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0080443600001205
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

William Ames's Calvinist Ambiguity Over Freedom of Conscience.James Calvin Davis - 2005 - Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):333 - 355.
Thomas Hobbess Theory of Conscience.Mark Hanin - 2012 - History of Political Thought 33 (1):55-85.
Liberty of Ecological Conscience.Aaron Lercher - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (3):315-322.
The Conscience Principle.Mark C. Murphy - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:387-407.
Nature and Conduct.Richard Stanley Peters (ed.) - 1975 - St. Martin's Press.
Conscience in Medieval Philosophy.Timothy C. Potts (ed.) - 1980 - Cambridge University Press.
What is Conscience and Why is Respect for It so Important?Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):135-149.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
15 ( #697,956 of 2,507,562 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,562 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes