Human Rights Review 8 (1):35-52 (2006)

Abigail Gosselin
Regis University
Many rights theorists argue that global poverty violates certain human rights, so that responsibility to address poverty involves carrying out the duties that correspond with relevant rights-claims. Liberatirians argue that the rights and duties associated with global poverty, especially what are sometimes thought of as “positive” rights, or rights of assistance, are inappropriately agent-neutral, giving them less justificatory force than agent-relative rights and duties. To counter libertarian concerns, Thomas Pogge tries to reframe the responsibilities corresponding to human rights as institutional rather than as belonging to agents. While admirable, his approach inadequately expalains the relationships between institutional responsibility and individual and collective action. A better way to respond to libertarian concerns—that is also compatible with Pogge’s emphasis on institutional responsibility—is to show that the duties regarding global poverty are indeed agent-relative, but by virtue of individual and collective action within institutions
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12142-006-1014-7
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,265
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Institutional Responsibility for Global Problems.Michael J. Green - 2002 - Philosophical Topics 30 (2):79-95.
A Human Rights Approach to World Hunger.James Nickel - 1995 - In William Aiken Hugh LaFollette (ed.), World Hunger and Morality. Prentice-Hall. pp. 2--171.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Group Freedom: A Social Mechanism Account.Frank Hindriks - 2017 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47 (6):410-439.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Poverty, Negative Duties and the Global Institutional Order.Magnus Reitberger - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (4):379-402.
Punishing States That Cause Global Poverty.Thom Brooks - 2007 - William Mitchell Law Review 33 (2):519-32.
The Duty to Eradicate Global Poverty: Positive or Negative?Pablo Gilabert - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):537-550.
On Not Excluding the Poor Yet Again.Charles Courtney - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 11:25-32.
The Role of Education in Freedom From Poverty as a Human Right.Pradeep Dhillon - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (3):249-259.
Global Responsibility for Human Rights.Sigrun I. Skogly - 2009 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29 (4):827-847.


Added to PP index

Total views
38 ( #298,989 of 2,507,664 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,530 of 2,507,664 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes