The Pseudoscience Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe [Book Review]

Isis 104:416-417 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/672201

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Pseudoscience Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe.Michael D. Gordin - 2012 - University of Chicago Press.
Michael D. Gordin. The Pseudoscience Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe. x + 291 pp., index. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, 2012. $29. [REVIEW]Mott Greene - 2013 - Isis 104 (2):416-417.
Michael D. Gordin, The Pseudo-science Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2012. Pp. x+291. ISBN 978-0-226-30442-7. £18.50. [REVIEW]Simone Turchetti - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Science 47 (2):386-387.
How Lysenkoism Became Pseudoscience: Dobzhansky to Velikovsky. [REVIEW]Michael D. Gordin - 2012 - Journal of the History of Biology 45 (3):443 - 468.
Worlds in Collision. [REVIEW]Brian Coffey - 1951 - Modern Schoolman 28 (2):162-164.
Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk.Massimo Pigliucci - 2010 - University of Chicago Press.
Science, Pseudoscience, and Science Falsely So-CaIIed.Daniel P. Thurs & Ronald L. Numbers - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 121.
The "Jewish Science" of Immanuel Velikovsky: Culture and Biography as Ideational Determinants.Duane Leroy Vorhees - 1990 - Dissertation, Bowling Green State University
Worlds in Collision by Immanuel Velikovsky. [REVIEW]O. Neugebauer - 1950 - Isis 41:245-246.
The Social Psychology of “Pseudoscience”: A Brief History.Arthur Still & Windy Dryden - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (3):265-290.
Do extraordinary claims really require extraordinary evidence?Massimo Pigliucci - 2009 - In K. Frazier (ed.), Science Under Siege: Defending Science, Exposing Pseudoscience. Prometheus.
The fuzziness of pseudoscience: Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry : Philosophy of pseudoscience: Reconsidering the demarcation problem. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013, vii+469, $105 HB, $35 PB.Robert Nola - 2014 - Metascience 24 (2):279-284.
Beyond the Fringe.Jon Opie - unknown
The philosophy behind pseudoscience.Behind Pseudoscience - 2009 - In Kendrick Frazier (ed.), Science Under Siege: Defending Science, Exposing Pseudoscience. Prometheus. pp. 235.
Is Sociobiology a Pseudoscience?R. Paul Thompson - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 370.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
20 (#747,345)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Diagnosing Pseudoscience – by Getting Rid of the Demarcation Problem.Maarten Boudry - 2022 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 53 (2):83-101.
Identifying Pseudoscience: A Social Process Criterion.Gregory W. Dawes - 2018 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 49 (3):283-298.
Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On.William J. Devlin & Alisa Bokulich (eds.) - 2015 - Cham: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 311. Springer.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references