- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Anthrax Solution: The Sverdlovsk Incident and the Resolution of a Biological Weapons Controversy [Book Review]
Journal of the History of Biology 30 (3):441 - 480 (1997)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.1023/a:1004299907049
My notes
Similar books and articles
Is all fair in biological warfare? The controversy over genetically engineered biological weapons.J. M. Appel - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (7):429-432.
Coding ethical behaviour: The challenges of biological weapons.Brian Rappert - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):453-470.
What are the moral limits of weapons research?John Forge - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):76-87.
The bioterrorism threat and dual-use biotechnological research: An israeli perspective.David Friedman, Bracha Rager-Zisman, Eitan Bibi & Alex Keynan - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):85-97.
“Strictly for the Birds”: Science, the Military and the Smithsonian's Pacific Ocean Biological Survey Program, 1963–1970. [REVIEW]Roy MacLeod - 2001 - Journal of the History of Biology 34 (2):315 - 352.
Education and Ethics in the Life Sciences: Strengthening the Prohibition of Biological Weapons.Brian Rappert (ed.) - 2010 - Anu E Press.
What is Kant: A compatibilist or an incompatibilist? A new interpretation of Kant's solution to the free will problem.Simon Shengjian Xie - 2009 - Kant Studien 100 (1):53-76.
The difference between selection and drift: A reply to Millstein. [REVIEW]Robert N. Brandon - 2005 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (1):153-170.
Disarming nuclear apologists.Robert E. Goodin - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):153 – 176.
On deciding whether protistans are cells.John R. Gregg - 1959 - Philosophy of Science 26 (4):338-346.
Putnam's resolution of the Popper-Kuhn controversy.Chhanda Gupta - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (172):319-334.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-05-29
Downloads
48 (#249,858)
6 months
2 (#322,315)
2011-05-29
Downloads
48 (#249,858)
6 months
2 (#322,315)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ffd8f9497-mnh4c N