Proving unprovability in some normal modal logics

Bulletin of the Section of Logic 20 (1):23-29 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This note considers deductive systems for the operator a of unprovability in some particular propositional normal modal logics. We give thus complete syntactic characterization of these logics in the sense of Lukasiewicz: for every formula  either `  or a  (but not both) is derivable. In particular, purely syntactic decision procedure is provided for the logics under considerations.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Normal monomodal logics can simulate all others.Marcus Kracht & Frank Wolter - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):99-138.
Modal sequents for normal modal logics.Claudio Cerrato - 1993 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 39 (1):231-240.
Independent propositional modal logics.S. K. Thomason - 1980 - Studia Logica 39 (2-3):143 - 144.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
177 (#107,404)

6 months
56 (#75,949)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Valentin Goranko
Stockholm University

Citations of this work

Rejection in Łukasiewicz's and Słupecki's Sense.Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska - 2018 - In Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska & Ángel Garrido (eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School. Past and Present. Cham, Switzerland: Springer- Birkhauser,. pp. 575-597.
A łukasiewicz-style refutation system for the modal logic S.Tomasz Skura - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (6):573 - 582.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An essay in classical modal logic.Krister Segerberg - 1971 - Uppsala,: Filosofiska föreningen och Filosofiska institutionen vid Uppsala universitet.
Aristotle's Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic.JAN LUKASIEWICZ - 1951 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 57 (4):456-458.
Modal Logic and Classical Logic.R. A. Bull - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (2):557-558.

Add more references