Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (3):281-320 (2011)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Beginning with Berkeley and Leibniz, philosophers have been puzzled by the close yet ambivalent association in Newton's ontology between God and absolute space and time. The 1962 publication of Newton's highly philosophical manuscript De Gravitatione has enriched our understanding of his subtle, sometimes cryptic, remarks on the divine underpinnings of space and time in better-known published works. But it has certainly not produced a scholarly consensus about Newton's exact position. In fact, three distinct lines of interpretation have emerged: Independence: space and time are not essentially related to God. Causation: space and time are caused by God. Assimilation: space and time are attributes of God. This paper defends the third interpretation against the first two by drawing out the under-appreciated influence of Descartes' metaphysics on Newton's ‘physico-theology’.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1515/AGPH.2011.013 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Newtonian Emanation, Spinozism, Measurement and the Baconian Origins of the Laws of Nature.Eric Schliesser - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (3):449-466.
By Ye Divine Arm: God and Substance in De Gravitatione.Hylarie Kochiras - 2013 - Religious Studies 49 (3):327-356.
Definitions More Geometrarum and Newton's Scholium on Space and Time.Zvi Biener - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics:179-191.
Seventh Quadrennial Fellows Conference of the Center for Philosophy of Science.-Preprint Volume- - unknown
Similar books and articles
Huygens' Center-of-Mass Space-Time Reference Frame: Constructing a Cartesian Dynamics in the Wake of Newton's “de Gravitatione” Argument.Edward Slowik - 1997 - Synthese 112 (2):247-269.
Newton's "de Gravitatione" Argument: Cartesian Relationalist Dynamics and the Structure of Space and Time.Edward Steven Slowik - 1994 - Dissertation, The Ohio State University
Newton, the Parts of Space, and the Holism of Spatial Ontology.Edward Slowik - 2011 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (2):249-272.
Written in the Flesh: Isaac Newton on the Mind–Body Relation.Liam Dempsey - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (3):420-441.
Existence, Actuality and Necessity: Newton on Space and Time.J. E. McGuire - 1978 - Annals of Science 35 (5):463-508.
Newton's Metaphysics of Space: A “Tertium Quid” Betwixt Substantivalism and Relationism, or Merely a “God of the (Rational Mechanical) Gaps”?Edward Slowik - 2009 - Perspectives on Science 17 (4):pp. 429-456.
The Landau-Peierls Relation and a Causal Bound in Covariant Relativistic Quantum Theory.R. Arshansky & L. P. Horwitz - 1985 - Foundations of Physics 15 (6):701-715.
Newton's Views on Space, Time, and Motion.Robert Rynasiewicz - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Newtonian Time and Psychological Explanation.B. D. Slife - 1995 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 16 (1):45-62.
Newton and Descartes: Theology and Natural Philosophy.Andrew Janiak - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):414-435.
„ “What is Time?”.Yitzhak Y. Melamed - 2014 - In Aaron Garrett (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Eighteenth Century Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 232-244.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-09-05
Total views
99 ( #118,075 of 2,506,112 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,112 )
2011-09-05
Total views
99 ( #118,075 of 2,506,112 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,112 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads