Hegel and the Politics of Difference: The Paradox of Identity and Freedom

Dissertation, Yale University (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This dissertation uses Hegel's political thought to work through several problems of identity and difference ranging from discrimination against individuals, to the inclusion of social identity groups in formal institutions, to the association of state power and national identity. I argue that the foundational problem which gives rise to these issues is a paradoxical relationship between identity and freedom. On the one hand, identities constrain freedom, as in discrimination for example. On the other hand, identities are necessary forgiving us horizons for judgment, social forms of meaning and institutional structures which make the exercise of freedom meaningful. Finally, there is a third issue which makes the relationship even more complex: the value we place on modern freedom is crucially connected to identity. Freedom gives us the space and opportunity to develop ourselves in accord with certain plans and priorities, the space for us to forge our own identities. Hegel is deeply attentive to the complex and paradoxical character of the relationship between freedom and identity in his concept of the person, his concept of freedom and the account of social life they ground. Reinterpreting Hegel's political thought with the relationship between identity and freedom as a focus, reveals the theoretical tensions underlying contemporary problems of the "politics of difference" and uncovers constructive solutions to them. Most importantly, Hegel's thought inspires us to affirm a model in which identity and its political significance are context dependent. For example, in the context of feminism's project of liberation, this framework leads me to a critical appraisal of the demands for recognition of difference promoted by gynocentric feminism as either a solution for sexism or as a mode of social criticism; however, in the context of nationalist demands in the liberal state my view gives cautious endorsement to claims for the recognition of differences material to the realization of local forms of the rule of law. Overall, this Hegel-inspired approach provides a way for us to live through, rather than in, the paradox of identity and freedom

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Principle of Freedom in the Law of Democratic Country.Saulius Arlauskas & Daiva Petrėnaitė - 2013 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 20 (2):407-428.
The concept of ethical life in Hegel's Philosophy of Right.K. Kierans - 1992 - History of Political Thought 13 (3):417-435.
Hegel and Politics.Mary Beth Wong - 1991 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Verdinglichung und Freiheit.Timo Jütten - 2011 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 59 (5):717-730.
Hegel’s Theory of Liberation.Christoph Menke - 2013 - Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 17 (1):10-30.
Hegel and the Problem of Modern Freedom.John Kenneth Kierans - 1986 - Dissertation, University of Oxford (United Kingdom)
Hegel's idea of freedom.Alan Patten - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
1 (#1,866,476)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references