The Judge’s Two Bodies: The Case of Daniel Paul Schreber

Law and Critique 26 (2):117-133 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The great work of the psychotic judge Daniel Paul Schreber, namely Memoirs of My Nervous Illness, has received predictable and rather unimaginative interpretations as the discourse of a lunatic. The work has not been studied as a theory of law. Schreber, it is argued here, was an extreme lawyer, a radical melancholegalist, a black letter theorist, a critic avant la lettre, and a radical theorist of an impure jurisprudence



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,336

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

"My So-Called Delusions": Solipsism, Madness, and the Schreber Case.Louis A. Sass - 1994 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 25 (1):70-103.
Schreber revisité. Colloque de Cerisy.Daniel Devreese, Zvi Lothane & Jacques Schotte - 1999 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 61 (2):396-397.
Schreber's Panopticism: Psychosis and the Modern Soul.Louis Sass - 1987 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 54.
Law and Gynesis: Freud v. Schreber.John O'Neill - 1992 - In Philippa Berry & Andrew Wernick (eds.), Shadow of Spirit: Postmodernism and Religion. Routledge. pp. 238--249.


Added to PP

60 (#228,253)

6 months
2 (#519,839)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Daniel Loick
Humboldt University, Berlin
Chad Kautzer
Lehigh University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references