Moral Outrage: Territoriality in Human Guise

Zygon 32 (1):5-27 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Moral outrage is a response to the behavior of others, never one's own. It is a response to infringements or transgressions on what people perceive to be the immunities they, or others with whom they identify, can expect on the basis of their rights and privileges and what they understand to be their reasonable expectations regarding the behavior of others. A person's culturally defined social identities and the rights and privileges that go with them in relationships to which those identities can be party make up the contents of that person's social persona and also constitute that person's social territory. Infringements of rights and privileges in the social and symbolic worlds in which humans live are the equivalent of encroachments on territory among animals, and moral outrage can be understood as the human expression of what we perceive as territorial behavior in animals. As emotion, outrage is affected by such clinical processes as displacement, rationalization, projection, and reaction formation. Outrage has an essential role in the maintenance of viable social groups, but it also exacerbates conflict among people who perceive one another as “others.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Migration, territoriality, and culture.Michael Blake & Mathias Risse - 2008 - In Ryberg Jesper & Petersen Thomas (eds.), New Waves in Applied Ethics. Palgrave.
Piercing the veil: Ethical issues in ethnographic research.Brian Schrag - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2):135-160.
The linguistic territoriality principle — a critique.Helder de Schutter - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):105–120.
Moral Outrage and Opposition to Harm Reduction.Robert J. MacCoun - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):83-98.
Child rape, moral outrage, and the death penalty.Susan A. Bandes - 2008 - Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy 103.
Two (related) world views.Edward N. Zalta - 1995 - Noûs 29 (2):189-211.
Moore's paradox and Crimmins's case.David Rosenthal - 2002 - Analysis 62 (2):167-171.
Guises and their existence.Alberto Voltolini - 1996 - Axiomathes 7 (3):419-434.
Moral instinct and moral judgment.Liangkang Ni - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (2):238-250.
Climate Change and Moral Outrage.James Garvey - 2010 - Human Ecology Review 17 (2):96-101.
Russell: The last great radical?Alan Ryan - 1996 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26 (2):247-266.
Anthropology, history, and education.Immanuel Kant - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Günter Zöller & Robert B. Louden.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
70 (#224,929)

6 months
6 (#417,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?