Henry Johnstone, Jr.'s Still-Unacknowledged Contributions to Contemporary Argumentation Theory

Informal Logic 21 (1) (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Given the pragmatic tum recently taken by argumentation studies, we owe renewed attention to Henry Johnstone's views on the primacy of process over product. In particular, Johnstone's decidedly non-cooperative model is a refreshing alternative to the current dialogic theories of arguing, one which opens the way for specifically rhetorical lines of inquiry

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.22329/il.v21i1.2234

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Con Amore: Henry Johnstone, Jr.'s Philosophy of Argumentation.James Crosswhite - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (1).
Johnstone's View of Rhetorical and Dialectical Argument.Douglas Walton - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (1).
Revision and Immortality in Philosophical Argumentation: Continuing Thoughts on the Rhetorical Wedge.Mari Lee Mifsud - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (1).
Can There Be Non-Rhetorical Argumentation?Olivier Reboul & Henry W. Johnstone - 1988 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 21 (3):220 - 233.
The 'Most Important and Fundamental' Distinction in Logic.Richard B. Angell - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (1).
Locke and Whately on the Argumentum ad Hominem.Henry W. Johnstone - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (1):89-97.
Henry W. Johnstone, Jr.: A Bibliography, 1948-1997.Henry W. Johnstone - 1998 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 31 (1):6 - 18.
Plato's Critique of the Poets and the Misunderstanding of His Epistemological Argumentation.Hermann Wiegmann & Henry W. Johnstone - 1990 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 23 (2):109 - 124.
A new theory of philosophical argumentation.Henry W. Johnstone - 1954 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15 (2):244-252.
Editor's introduction.Henry W. Johnstone - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (4):379-384.
Is “Argument” subject to the product/process ambiguity?Geoff Goddu - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (2):75-88.
Self-application in philosophical argumentation.Henry W. Johnstone - 1989 - Metaphilosophy 20 (3-4):247-261.
Introduction.Ralph H. Johnson & Christopher W. Tindale - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):379-391.
Kinship: The relationship between Johnstone's ideas about philosophical argument and the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation.F. H. Eemerevann & Peter Houtlosser - 2007 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 40 (1):51-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
98 (#170,891)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation.Trudy Govier - 2018 - Windsor: University of Windsor.
Metaphors We Live By.George Lakoff & Mark Johnson - 1980 - Ethics 93 (3):619-621.
Metaphors We Live by.Max Black - 1980 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 40 (2):208-210.
A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy.Douglas Walton - 2003 - University Alabama Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references