Discussion, Collaborative Knowledge Work and Epistemic Fluency

British Journal of Educational Studies 55 (4):351-368 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues for an action-oriented conception of learning in higher education: one which marries higher order learning with apprenticeship in knowledge work. It introduces epistemic tasks, forms and fluency as constructs that are useful in giving a more precise meaning to ideas about collaboration in knowledge construction. Discussion is seen as central to collaborative knowledge work and we examine the role of discussion in supporting weaker and stronger interpretations of collaborative knowledge construction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The epistemic significance of collaborative research.K. Brad Wray - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (1):150-168.
Epistemic Value.Patrick Bondy - 2015 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy:0-0.
Epistemic responsibility.J. Angelo Corlett - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (2):179 – 200.
Value, Epistemic.Patrick Bondy - 2015 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Collaborative knowledge.Paul Thagard - 1997 - Noûs 31 (2):242-261.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
24 (#639,942)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Objective knowledge.Karl Raimund Popper - 1972 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press.
Realizing the university in an age of supercomplexity.Ronald Barnett - 2000 - Philadelphia, PA: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
For a Radical Higher Education: After Postmodernism.Richard Taylor, Jean Barr & Tom Steele - 2004 - British Journal of Educational Studies 52 (2):210-213.
Conceptual Learning: The Priority for Higher Education.Effie Maclellan - 2005 - British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (2):129 - 147.

Add more references