Legitimate Intergenerational Constitutionalism

Intergenerational Justice Review 9 (2) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the legitimacy conditions of constitutionalism by examining one particular type of constitutional provision: provisions aimed at advancing future generations’ interests. After covering the main forms that such provisions can adopt; it first considers three legitimacy gains of constitutionalising them. It then explores two legitimacy concerns that so doing raises. Given that constitutions are difficult to amend; constitutionalisation may threaten future generations’ sovereignty. And it may also make the constitution’s content impossible to adapt to changing circumstances and interests. Finally; the paper examines the ways in which such concerns may be addressed at the adoption; formulation; and amendment stages. In particular; it discusses if the use of sunset clauses and regular constitutional conventions may; and under what conditions; successfully address such concerns.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are Constitutions Legitimate.Andrei Marmor - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20 (1):69-94.
The constitutional theatre.Olaf Tans - 2002 - Res Publica 8 (3):231-248.
Constitutional Handcuffs.Richard Albert - 2017 - Intergenerational Justice Review 10 (1).
Intergenerational Justice.Axel Gosseries & Lukas H. Meyer - 2009 - Oxford, Royaume-Uni: Oxford University Press.
The Language of Liberal Constitutionalism.Howard H. Schweber - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Constitutionalism in the Age of Terror.Michael Zuckert & Felix Valenzuela - 2011 - Social Philosophy and Policy 28 (1):72-114.
Intergenerational justice.Lukas Meyer - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-12

Downloads
26 (#577,276)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Iñigo González Ricoy
Universitat de Barcelona

References found in this work

Law and disagreement.Jeremy Waldron - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Law and Disagreement.Jeremy Waldron - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.
Law and Disagreement.Arthur Ripstein & Jeremy Waldron - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (4):611.
Inclusive Constitution‐Making: The Icelandic Experiment.Hélène Landemore - 2014 - Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (2):166-191.

View all 12 references / Add more references