Dialectic and dialogue in the hermeneutics of Paul ricœur and H.g. Gadamer

Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3):313-345 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The present paper uses the theme of dialectic and dialogue to begin unraveling the similarities and differences between the hermeneutics of Paul Ricoeur and H.G. Gadamer. Ricoeur is shown to distance himself from Heidegger by insisting on a dimension of explanation and distanciation (which he sometimes identifies with Plato's `descending dialectic') that cannot be reduced to, or absorbed by, understanding and appropriation. This same move, however, leads him to reject Platonic dialogue, with the attendant prioritizing of oral conversation over the written text, as a model for hermeneutics. Ricoeur therefore sees in Gadamer's recourse to such a model a regression to the problematic position of Heidegger. Yet the conception of philosophy as dialectical and dialogical which Gadamer finds in Plato is capable of responding to Ricoeur's objections. Where the fundamental difference between the hermeneutics of Ricoeur and Gadamer emerges is in the question of whether experience is fundamentally dialectical and whether language is inherently dialogical.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,764

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
207 (#87,016)

6 months
6 (#200,874)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Francisco Javier González Chapela
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

Citations of this work

Gadamers verständnis der tradition.Sasa Radojcic - 2009 - Filozofija I Društvo 20 (1):71-91.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references