The Hart‐Fuller Debate

Philosophy Compass 9 (1):45-53 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I will center the discussion of the Hart-Fuller debate on the five claims Hart mentions might be understood as legal positivisms main tenets: (1) the command theory; (2) the no necessary connection thesis; (3) the methodological claim; (4) the charge of positivism as formalism and the problem of interpretation; and (5) the meta-ethical confusion. In light of these five claims, I will explore whether the exchange of views between Hart and Fuller in 1957 truly amounted to a debate. Sorting out this issue is the aim of this article

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-12

Downloads
240 (#80,400)

6 months
36 (#95,538)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Juan Gomez
University of Otago

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The concept of law.Hla Hart - 1961 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Taking rights seriously.Ronald Dworkin (ed.) - 1977 - London: Duckworth.
Law’s Empire.Ronald Dworkin - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
Natural law and natural rights.John Finnis - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Ethics 90 (1):121-130.

View all 19 references / Add more references