Foundations of Physics 48 (6):668-715 (2018)

Henrique Gomes
Cambridge University
The inherent difficulty in talking about quantum decoherence in the context of quantum cosmology is that decoherence requires subsystems, and cosmology is the study of the whole Universe. Consistent histories gave a possible answer to this conundrum, by phrasing decoherence as loss of interference between alternative histories of closed systems. When one can apply Boolean logic to a set of histories, it is deemed ‘consistent’. However, the vast majority of the sets of histories that are merely consistent are blatantly nonclassical in other respects, and further constraints than just consistency need to be invoked. In this paper, I attempt to give an alternative answer to the issues faced by consistent histories, by exploring a timeless interpretation of quantum mechanics of closed systems. This is done solely in terms of path integrals in non-relativistic, timeless, configuration space. What prompts a fresh look at such foundational problems in this context is the advent of multiple gravitational models in which Lorentz symmetry is not fundamental, but only emergent. And what allows this approach to overcome previous barriers to a timeless, conditional probabilities interpretation of quantum mechanics is the new notion of records—made possible by an inherent asymmetry of configuration space. I outline and explore consequences of this approach for foundational issues of quantum mechanics, such as the natural emergence of the Born rule, conservation of probabilities, and the Sleeping Beauty paradox.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10701-018-0172-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,583
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics?Franck Laloë - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
Time, Quantum Mechanics, and Decoherence.Simon Saunders - 1995 - Synthese 102 (2):235 - 266.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Consistent Histories in Quantum Cosmology.David Craig & Parampreet Singh - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (3):371-379.
Consistent Histories of Systems and Measurements in Spacetime.Ed Seidewitz - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (7):1163-1192.
The New Quantum Logic.Robert B. Griffiths - 2014 - Foundations of Physics 44 (6):610-640.
The Histories of Chaotic Quantum Systems.Walter Thirring - 1999 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 7:187-198.
What is a Wavefunction.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2015 - Synthese 192 (10):3247-3274.


Added to PP index

Total views
25 ( #443,367 of 2,461,991 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,909 of 2,461,991 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes