A Naturalistic Defense of “Human Only” Moral Subjects

Dilemata 9:69-73 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Moral functionalism and moral reductionism.Mark van Roojen - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (182):77-81.
The insufficience of supervenient explanations of moral actions: Really taking Darwin and the naturalistic fallacy seriously. [REVIEW]William A. Rottschaefer & David Martinsen - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (4):439-445.
Is the Naturalistic Fallacy Dead (and If So, Ought It Be?).Oren Harman - 2012 - Journal of the History of Biology 45 (3):557 - 572.
The Free-Will Defense Defended.G. Stanley Kane - 1976 - New Scholasticism 50 (4):435-446.
Experimentation with human subjects: a critique of the views of Hans Jonas.A. Schafer - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (2):76-79.
Beyond voluntary consent: Hans Jonas on the moral requirements of human experimentation.C. Fethe - 1993 - Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (2):99-103.
The Paradox of Self-Defense: Saving Oneself by Harming Another.Whitley R. P. Kaufman - 2009 - Lexington Books.
Researchers and Firing Squads: Questions Concerning the Use of Frozen Human Embryos.P. Tully - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (5):516-528.
Against Moral Responsibility.Bruce N. Waller - 2011 - MIT Press.
Political and Naturalistic Conceptions of Human Rights: A False Polemic?S. Matthew Liao & Adam Etinson - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (3):327-352.
Defense.Kai Draper - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 145 (1):69 - 88.
Naturalistic Moral Realism and Moral Disagreement: David Copp’s Account.Mark Hanin - 2012 - Res Publica 18 (4):283-301.
Really taking Darwin and the naturalistic fallacy seriously: An objection to Rottschaefer and Martinsen. [REVIEW]Jonathan Barrett - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (4):433-437.
Torture. How denying Moral Standing violates Human Dignity.Andreas Maier - forthcoming - In Webster Elaine & Kaufmann Paulus (eds.), Violations of Human Dignity. Springer.
Iwant in this chapter to consider the kind of morality we would have reason to believe if it were the case that we inhabit a naturalistic universe. In particular, I want to consider whether in a naturalistic cosmos we would have reason to believe—as very many modern people in fact do—in universal benevolence and human rights as moral facts and imperatives.Christian Smith - 2009 - In Jeffrey Schloss & Michael J. Murray (eds.), The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion. Oxford University Press. pp. 292.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
18 (#808,169)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.

Add more references